Th? ?isc?v??? ?? m?mmi?s ?lw??s ??scin?t?s E???t?l??ists ?n? civil s?ci?t? its?l? wh?n l??kin? ?t s?ch ?nci?nt ??ti??cts. St???in? th?m, h?w?v??, c?n ?? ?n ??????s ???c?ss, ?s th? ?nti??it? ?? th? ?i?c?s m?k?s th?m inc???sin?l? s?nsitiv? ?v?? tіm?.It is cl???, th???????, th?t th? ???s??v?ti?n ?? th?s? ?nci?nt ???i?s ??????n?l? limits th? ??s???ch c???cit? ?? ??ch???l??ists, wh? n??? t? ?v??c?m? th?s? ??st?icti?ns.On? ?? th? m?st ?m?l?m?tic c?s?s h????n?? wh?n M?mm? #30007 w?s ???n?. M?n? ??c???s ??ss?? ?????? ??s???ch??s w??? ??l? t? c?n??ct ? ?????? st??? ?? th? s??c??h???s — ????n? j?st l??kin? ?t its ?xt??i??.
B?c??s? th?? w??? c?nc?nt??t?? ?n th? ??tsi??, th? ?isc?v??? ??c?m? kn?wn ?s th? G?l??n L???. Th? n?m? ?????s t? th? ??t?ils st?m??? ?n th? m?mm?’s s??c??h???s, c?nt?inin? n?m????s ??l? ?n? lin?n ??t?ils. Sh? w?s ?ls? w???in? ? ??l??n h??????ss, ?n? h?? ??ci?l ???t???s w??? ??int??.Th? M?mm?’s c???in w?s ??int?? in th? ??tt??ns ?? th? R?m?n E?? in E???t, ??tw??n 30 BC ?n? 646 AD. On its ??c? w??? l????s ?? ??????s c?v???? with ??l? ?s ? kin? ?? ???th m?sk.Acc???in? t? E???t?l??ists, this c?nc??ns th? ??li?? ?t th? tіm? th?t, ??t?? ???th, ? w?m?n w??l? k??? h?? ???s, n?s?, ?n? m??th int?ct ??c??s? sh? w??l? still n??? h?? s?ns?s.Th? ??t?ils still ?ll?w ??ch???l??ists t? ???ch ?th?? c?ncl?si?ns ????t th? hist??ic?l ???i?? t? which it ??l?n???. Wh?n E???t w?s ? ???vinc? ?? th? R?m?n Em?i??, th? m?mmi?ic?ti?n ???c?ss ????n t? s????? ???m th? n?w in?l??nc?s.This int???cti?n m?? ?x?l?in wh? sh? w?s n?t in ? w????n c???in (c?mm?n ?????? th? R?m?n ???) ??t in ? c??s?l? m??? ?? lin?n ?n? c????????, which ??s?m?l?? ???i??-mâché.
Littl? w?s kn?wn ????t th? G?l??n L??? ?t th?t tіm?, ?n? ?v?n t????, th??? is n?t m?ch in???m?ti?n ?th?? th?n h?? ??ssi?l? ?h?sic?l ch???ct??istics ?n? ??t? ?? ???th.H?? i??ntit?, h?w?v??, ??m?ins ?l?siv?: wh? w?s this w?m?n ?m??lm?? ?v?? 1,500 ????s ??? with s?ch ?ich ??c???ti?n?Th? s??c??h???s w?s n?v?? ???n??. Y?t, ??c??s? th? c???in’s c?nt?nts w??? v??? ????il?, x-??? im???s w??? ??l? t? sc?n its int??i?? ?sin? m????n c?m??t??iz?? t?m?????h? ???i?m?nt ?n? ??v??l ???t???s ?? th? M.Th? sc?ns sh?w?? th?t th? w?m?n w?s ??????l? in h?? mi?-40s wh?n sh? ?i??, h?? c??l? h?i?, ?n? ? sli?ht ?v???it? – h?? l?w?? t??th sli?htl? ?v??l???in? h?? ????? t??th.Acc???in? t? th? th?n c???t?? ?? th? Am??ic?n M?s??m ?? N?t???l Hist???, D?vi? H??st Th?m?s, ??s??nsi?l? ??? th? ?xhi?iti?n in which th? G?l??n L??? is ?x??s??, th? t?chni??? ???s n?t h??m th? c?nt?nts ?? th? c???in ?n? ?ls? ?ll?ws ??s???ch??s t? ??t?in m??? in???m?ti?n ????t th? m?mm?.
“Sc?ns lik? th?s? ??? n?n-inv?siv?, ?????t??l?, ?n? c?n ?? ??n? with??t ??m??in? th? st??? w?’?? t??in? t? ?n???st?n?,” Th?m?s ?x?l?in??.S??ci?lists ?t th? Fi?l? M?s??m ?? N?t???l Hist??? in Chic???, USA, ?s?? CT sc?ns t? ??????m ? vi?t??l ??c?nst??cti?n ?? th? w?m?n’s sk?ll.With this t?chn?l???, F??nch ????nsic ??tist Élis???th D??nès w?s ?ls? ??l? t? ??n???t? ? 3D ??c?nst??cti?n ?? th? E???ti?n’s ??c?, c???tin? ? ??ith??l ???lic? ?? th? M?mm?’s ??c? with??t ?v?n ???nin? th? c???in.In ???iti?n, ??s???ch??s w??? ?ls? ??l? t? ??int ??t ??ssi?l? c??s?s ??? th? G?l??n L???’s ???th. Evi??nc? ???m th? t?sts s????sts th?t sh? m?? h?v? ?i?? ??t?? c?nt??ctin? t????c?l?sis, ? ?is??s? th?t ??c?m? c?mm?n in Anci?nt E???t ??? t? its l???? ????l?ti?n.Still, n?thin? — ?? v??? littl? — is kn?wn ????t th? m?mm?’s i??ntit?. With n? i??nti?ic?ti?n ?? h?? n?m? ??c??s? th??? ??? n? hi????l??hs ?n h?? t?m? th?t ??v??l it, t?chnici?ns ?t th? Am??ic?n M?s??m ?? N?t???l Hist???, l?c?t?? in N?w Y??k, n?m?? th? w?m?n “G?l??n L???,”; th? n?m? ?? which sh? is kn?wn w??l?wi??. T????, it ??m?ins in th? c?ll?cti?n ?? th? m?s??m in ???sti?n in th? Unit?? St?t?s.